Worship Wars—faulty (and hurtful) logic

I am not an apologist. I have wasted countless hours in the past fretting about internet arguments over matters of faith and doctrine. However, when I read this blog post I felt a need to respond in some way.

In the post, the author (rightly so) talks about the evils of pornography, even quoting one of my favorite authors, C. S. Lewis—I love his thoughts on human appetite and sin. He then goes on to equate “CCM ‘praise music'” with being a “‘God apparatus’ [referencing Lewis’s notion of a “woman apparatus”] that encourages lust for a catchy beat over intimate knowledge of God’s Word.”

Throughout his post, he continues to use language like “largely true … much … most…” in regards to what he regards as the self-serving CCM “praise music.” If he doesn’t feel comfortable lumping in all “praise music,” then his argument is as if he is saying most porn is bad, much of it is merely about aesthetics. It’s just poor logic and a poor analogy.

This argument does nothing except deepen the chasm between steadfast traditionalists and those who see the benefit of good modern worship. It creates an “us-them” mentality.

I am not, nor have I ever been, a fan of “Trading My Sorrows” (one of the examples he uses). He uses the “yes Lord, yes Lord, yes yes Lord” chorus to drive home his point. But he completely ignores the “I am pressed but not crushed / persecuted not abandoned…” part. What do you say about that? Because last I checked, that’s right out of 2 Corinthians!

I wonder if he has pondered the lyrics of Paul Baloche’s and Glenn Packiam’s “Your Name,” of The Brilliance’s “Mother of God” or “Our God Alone.” These are just a few that have entered our recent repertoire at University Lutheran Chapel. These are songs that sing of God’s salvation through Jesus—the name above all names! It took me a while of singing Joel Houston’s “The Stand” to fully realize the beauty of the Trinity in its three verses. The author of the blog would likely argue about where the song ends up (“so I’ll stand…”), but I would argue back that it is all in response to what God has done and what was sung about in the verses (“in awe of the One who gave it all”).

I am not (I pray) prideful enough to think I have it all figured out. There are songs I used to do that I don’t anymore. I believe discernment needs to be used in selecting music to be sung in our worship services—of both lyrical content and musical qualities. We have sung hymns with beautiful words that the congregation awkwardly stumbled over—in our traditional service! The same can be said about modern songs that just didn’t click, as well as songs whose poetry got in the way of the message.

Luther was about getting the Word of God and the worship of His people into the vernacular. “A Mighty Fortress” was a new song that first week, and took some getting used to. There were wonderful hymns written before Luther, and many written after. Some are still in our hymnal while others have dropped off. I do not think all modern worship music will stand the test of time, but there are some that will—songs that are wonderful testaments to who God is and what he has done for us.

May what we do as worship leaders (and as worshippers) bring glory to God and not sow seeds of division. Let iron sharpen iron. Bring light to darkness. Where words of truth need to be spoken, let them be rooted in God’s truth and not just subjective personal taste based on limited empirical evidence. Shock with the gospel, not with things of man.

Sharing is nice:
This entry was posted in worship. Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to Worship Wars—faulty (and hurtful) logic

  1. jgreenkee88 says:

    What a bunch of sycophantic replies on that blog post. “Oh, you’re absolutely correct.” “This music IS of the devil.”

    I will wager that none of those who imply that porn and “CoWo” (what kind of acronym is that, anyway?) are one and the same have ever experienced a worship service where the Spirit has moved extremely powerfully using many different kinds of music, including hymns AND contemporary songs. Many very good contemporary songs are based on Psalms, written by a man after God’s own heart who also committed murder, adultery, and the like but we keep reading them from God’s own Word. (Or is that too tittilating to even mention in church?)

  2. pattim says:

    I was reading an article lately that said (in essence) that when we stop writing, composing, singing new Christian music the church will be dead.

  3. Pingback: Really Recommended Posts 1/3/14- Dinosaurs, Evangelists, Down Syndrome, and more! | J.W. Wartick -"Always Have a Reason"

  4. I’m a songwriter and I occasionally lead worship. I am quite choosy about the songs I play, a lot of modern songs are very shallow, but some are wonderful. In the songs I write I try to make sure they are biblically sound, and not just ‘a good sound’.

    I largely do not agree with that Lutheran article, it is far too dismissive. As for repetitive lyrics, maybe read Revelation 4:8.

    Worship should be a progression, a moving towards, and so the songs that accompany that worship.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

+ three = 11

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>